Veterans’ Use of Mental Health Services
Updated June 2002

Principal Investigator: Carole Siegel, Ph.D.; Co- Investigators: Judith Samuels, Ph.D. Shang Lin, Ph.D., Joseph Wanderling, M.S., Ellen Weissman, M.D. (Department of Veterans Affairs)

        

• To examine the types, amounts and costs of mental health services that veterans receive from the Department of Veterans� Affairs (VA) and from other public mental health systems; and
• To explore explanatory reasons for the differential use of these systems.

Rationale: Veterans obtain mental health services from both the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) system of health care and/or the non-federal mental health system. This project was initiated in response to concerns by the New York State Office of Mental Health (OMH) and VA policy makers about veterans' service utilization patterns for each system. The types, amounts and costs of mental health services that veterans receive from the Department of Veterans' Affairs (VA) and from other sectors are hypothesized to vary depending on Federal and State policies that determine mental health spending. As spending priorities and coverage guidelines change, it is important to be able to assess the cross-system impact. Phase I of the study proposed, using data for the study period 1988 to 1997 in New York State (NYS), to:

• Describe the veterans who are users of
• mental health services in the VA system
• mental health services provided, funded or certified by the NYSOMH;
• Estimate on a county level the number of persons using either or both systems for mental health services; 
• Develop an area level explanatory model of differential sector use in terms of area descriptors and VA and OMH service and funding policies.

In Phase II the study's focus was to:

• Determine the reasons for veterans selection and use of either or both systems, through direct interviews with veterans who are mental health service users.

Phase I of this study has received funding from the VA through a recently funded VISN-3 application for a Mental Illness Research and Education Clinical Center (MIRECC): Maximizing Recovery for Veterans with SMI by Bring Research into Practice, Larry Siever, M.D., Director.

The protocols of five similar "overlap" studies were reviewed in order to ensure the uniqueness and relevance of the present study. Prior work has been conducted by one of the investigators (RR) on the factors that affect access to VA mental health services (Rosenheck & Phil, 1997). Another investigator (CS) has conducted work on estimating the size of a population based on a cross-sectional survey and will be applied to data from the Patient Characteristics Survey of NYS, a primary data source for this study (Siegel et al., 1997; Laska et al., 1996, 1988).

RESEARCH ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS

Method: The study population is New York State veterans who were users of federal or non-federal mental health services in the alternate years between 1988 and 1999.

These veterans will be described in terms of the proportion of the total number of veterans they represent, their demographic and clinical characteristics and the types and costs of mental health services received in the year. The study year coincides with the OMH Patient Characteristic Survey time frame. The Laska-Meisner-Siegel (Laska et al., 1988) methodology will be used to estimate from the PCS cross-sectional sample, the annual number of veterans within broadly specified client subgroups receiving services of a given type. Annual costs will be based on the utilization data of the one week sample imputed up to the annual level, where programmatic cost data are obtained from the OMH Consolidated Cost Report Form.

For VA mental health service users client level data on service use and characteristics and cost data are available from VA administrative files.

Aim 2 - County level estimates of the number of persons using both systems:

We will obtain:

• Not, the number of veterans who are OMH service users in the PCS week;
• Nv, the number of veterans who are VA service users in the year; and
• Notv, the number of veterans in the PCS survey week who use VA services any time in the year.

These numbers will be obtained on a county level (for each of the 62 counties in New York State) for client subgroups based on ethnicity, age and broad diagnostic categories and for each of the study years. No will be annualized using the LMS method (Laska, et. al., 1966). The estimate of Notv will be based on the birthdate methodology (Larsen, 1994; Banks, et. al., 1996), merging the list of one-week OMH users with the annual list of VA users.

For these numbers we can estimate:

• To, the number of veterans who use only OMH services in the year;
• Tov, the number of veterans who use both systems in the year; and
• T, the number of veterans who use either system.

Aim 3 - An explanatory model of sector usage in terms of county level factors:

The vector of rates (To/T, Tv/T, Tov/T) is a measure of differential sector use. The aim is to examine county-level factors expected to affect these rates. A logic model of influence will guide the selection of variables hypothesized to impact on sector and overlap usage. These will include time-dependent variables of service availability and expenditures of each of the sectors, endogenous county characteristics reflecting economic and social characteristics, and policy impact variables. The user characteristics are also hypothesized to affect usage including location of inpatient services measured by the average distance of VA county residents to the closest State hospital, and to the closest VA hospital; VA and non-VA mental health expenditure variables; VA and non-VA service availability as measured by the density of non-federal mental health providers in an area; and policy variables chosen to reflect managed care introduction and penetration. Candidates for county factors include rural/urbanicity and socio-economic conditions. Since we will have overlap counts for ethnic/ age groups, and broad diagnostic groupings, we will be able to use these data in the modeling process described below. In addition new methodology for subset analysis under development in the Methods Core (Project: II-2) may also be applied.

A polychotomous weighted logistic regression model will be used to examine the explanatory value of the factors accounting for the variation in VA and OMH usage rates. Even though the rates are on a county level, to take account of different population sizes in the counties, the unit of analysis will be, in effect, a veteran and, in the same county each will be described by the same county factors. The dependent variable will be a three category variable indicating whether the veteran receives services only from the VA; only from OMH, or from both systems.

We will also be able to examine sector usage in terms of models run for each of the study years. Significant variables in each year's models as well as the similarities and dissimilarities in the set of significant explanatory variables across years will provide insight into policy impact on sector usage. An additional time series model will be fit in which all observations over time are simultaneously used in a generalized linear model with a logistic link function. This type of model will allow us globally to test hypotheses concerning the impact of policy variables. Thus, for example, to examine the hypothesis that the penetration of Medicaid managed care will increase VA sector usage, we would expect the rate of VA use to be positively (and significantly) related to the increase in the penetration of managed care. A caveat of analysis is that these rates are based on the usage in a two-week sample. Missing are the sporadic users. However, if we assume that sporadic users are uniformly distributed across counties, the relational analyses that are performed should not be biased.

Results: Service use patterns have been generated for 1995, 1997, and 1999. The birthday methodology used to estimate overlap usage in each system was further refined (see Estimating Population Size Based on Birthdates) and was used to refine overlap (matches) estimates. 

In the VA, male usage increases over time, while in OMH there is a slight downward trend. For females >65, usage doubled from 1995-7, while in OMH there is a considerable decline in service use. In 1995 OMH usage was almost 5 times higher than in the VA; by 1999 the usage rates are similar. Overlap usage rates are approximately 6% for males >65; for females in the same age group usage increases by 2 to 6%. The elderly are less likely to use multiple systems. 

There is considerable variation in usage rates for both systems over counties. A relative cost weighting methodology is being used to compare costs of each system. A multinomial regression model will example the impact of OMH county level expenditures, the existence of a VA hospital in a county, the distance of the VA hospital from the county of residence of the veteran, the existence of VA outpatient clinics in a county, the distance  of the VA outpatient clinic in a county from the county of residence, and the age, gender and proportion of veterans in a county on service usage patterns.   

Population Counts by Year

p---VA                      �---OMH Annualized                     l---Matches

The VA has been going through a major reform effort. Part of that reform is to redirect resources to areas of the country that have larger veteran populations eligible for VA services. If this reform effort continues, the Northeastern region could lose a substantial portion of its budget because many older veterans have now moved to the south and southwest. Critics say those that remain are costlier to treat because of alcohol and drug-abuse problems as well as homelessness, mental illness and AIDS (Incalcaterra, 1997). In the Northeast, poorer patients without service-connected conditions may be forced to look elsewhere for care. Current policy of the VA is to treat any veteran who has a service connected condition and to treat those who do not as resources permit. In 1995, 59 % had no service-connected conditions, most of who were poor.

This eligibility policy is undergoing change that could have an unintended impact on other public health programs, especially increases in Medicaid spending. For other veterans it may cause an increase in out-of-pocket expenses or increase the public cost of caring for the uninsured. From the opposite direction, as more states mandate enrollment of Medicaid recipients into managed care plans and as Medicaid funding is constrained, veterans currently using the public mental health system may shift to VA services. 

As spending priorities and coverage guidelines change, it is important to be able to assess the cross-system impact in terms of utilization patterns.

A trend analysis will be performed and the multinomial regressions run. Results will be written up for presentation. 

   Inclusion of Gender and Minority Groups*:  
* Only data that are currently available filled in. 

Veterans using NYSOMH  

Veterans Using VA 

[Top]

HOME  

Cores: Negotiating Lives in Communities | Methods for MH Services Research | Systems Integration |  Promoting Recovery  |
Topics: Service Delivery Systems | Homelessness | Instrument Development | Managed Care | Mental Illness and Chemical Abuse | Multi-cultural Issues |  Improving Services Research | Recovery | Treatment Innovations |
Statistical Methods and Computer Programs